ucl, warwick, bath, which one is better generally?

visavis · 发表于 2003-8-9 14:24

From the rank, they are similar, so i am puzzled. Thanks !

Yashiro · 发表于 2003-8-10 22:18

你能写中文拽什么阿~我吐血!

warwick虽然年轻,好像是英国ZF很重视的学校!客林顿,不来而都演讲过,而且校园巨大!!

后劲不差!

visavis · 发表于 2003-8-10 21:37

等于没答案

anya · 发表于 2003-8-11 05:20

WARWICK很强，不过有一点新贵的味道，而且很傲。但他的校园和设备很不错哦。
BATH小镇，但是学文的好地方，而且是欧盟的欧洲研究中心。且学费生活费都比较能让人接受。
UCL第一学费比其他两所高3-4万，其次，我也说不清了：（

Yashiro · 发表于 2003-8-10 03:14

warwick商科,计算机强!

bath偏文,名气比warwick大许多!

ucl更是大名鼎鼎!

visavis · 发表于 2003-8-11 11:33

xie xie. my typing is slow. not mean to show off.

christal1 · 发表于 2003-8-9 19:17

generally, warwick is the best and ucl is ralatively worse, however, it depends on the course you choose. according to my experience, warwick is hard to acquire

eric · 发表于 2003-8-10 14:02

UCL~~~

visavis · 发表于 2003-8-10 10:21

Thank u guys! i dont really feel like going ucl since it`s in london. bath concentrates on research, for me i just wanna get a degree, not research type. warwick has not bad rank, but since it`s a young school, not very sure.

[申请相关] ucl, warwick, bath, which one is better generally?