PS写作范例 taisha.org 2002-04-19 11:07:21
What specifically have you done to help a group or organization change?
(300 word limit)
In 1990 as a senior associate at Condor C##被过滤##ulting, I headed?nbsp;a four person
Condor team for two years at Monitor Software (MS), a mid-size firm which
sold data-base management software products. Our mission was to convince 120
key MS programmers and engineers to sell MS c##被过滤##ulting services as a new
’product,’ in addition to their old engineering and programming tasks. These
valued and long-term employees were not sales oriented and were comfortable
with the status quo.?nbsp;Also, they were?nbsp;committed to finishing their current
projects, not adding to them.
I helped plan several company meetings and question-and-answer sessi##被过滤## to
share the company’s new?nbsp;vision. I explained the need for MS to change in
order to remain competitive. But many MS programmers and engineers, at the
end of our first orientation ’phase’ (6 months),?nbsp;were not committed to the
change. After carefully assessing these meetings with my own ’change’ team, I
told senior management the original plan would take 3 years instead of 15
months. We had to hire new people, deal with winning over more recruits, and?nbsp;
craft an exit strategy for those unwilling to join.
Over the next two years 70?nbsp;percent of the initial target audience signed on,
and 30 percent were transferred, quit,?nbsp;or let go. The new c##被过滤##ulting
’business’ became 25 percent of MS’ total revenues.
Executing lay-offs at the same time as making new hires was hard. So was
integrating new hires into this roiling environment.?nbsp;My team’s?nbsp;success was
based on?nbsp;(i) open communication, (ii) a willingness to change the first
plan, (iii) hiring outplacement and recruitment experts (after a failure of
trying this in-house) and?nbsp;(iv) c##被过滤##tantly sharing the new vision and
benefits. Although we revised the?nbsp;’change’ plan, we never waivered in our
ultimate commitment to it--and it showed.
Comment:
Not a pretty picture at MS, but a classic change essay with great content
and adequate execution and analysis. The essay deals with a key change
situation: veteran, skilled employees must adapt to an additional function:
selling c##被过滤##ulting services rather than just products. Reclusive engineering
types must start selling themselves, an impossible transition for a
substantial minority. The writer spearheads the change. The set up is
adequately described, followed by the?nbsp;the buzz-word filled analysis
(explained our vision, valued feedback, gave credit to resistance, recognized
early mistakes, hired experts, showed our commitment to change).?nbsp;While the
analysis is cursory, and repetitive, what gives this essay power is the
underlying explosiveness of the situation, a real blood bath (30 percent
firings) and for the survivors, a top-down change that nobody really
welcomed. What comes through by implication is that the writer is tough,
smart, and a natural leader. He is ’compassionate’ not so much by nature, but by training.?nbsp;A
perfect HBS type.?nbsp;He knew what you are supposed to do in
such a situation (hold meetings, explain the change, listen to resistance)
but that is where the book learning stopped and reality took over.
All that jazz did not really work--at least it did not work as originally
planned. Time for Phase Two: extend the deadline, keep up the ’vision’ drill,
fire people, and hire replacements.?nbsp;The detail about out-sourcing the hires
and fires, after failing to do it in-house, is powerful and telling. So is
last sentence about being committed to change, and showing that commitment.
Within the context of this essay, it rings true, and you can almost picture
the writer heading the entire two-year operation in a collected, firm,
intelligent, by-the-book business-like way.?nbsp;
More condensed writing and less repetition could have opened some space to
screw i |